Video game violence - what do you think about it?

Since video game designer able are, their imaginary characters to put on red pixels, who died recently, there were people who crusading against their subversive possibilities. Which video games seems cyclic, fade very shortly before the explosion in the public once more with renewed frenzy be. The controversy seems until recently again with numerous crimes blamed on the corruptive influence of video games have raised. There were also various "controversies" surrounding the last video games and their content in the areas of violence and sexuality.
The first game widespread criticism and media attention was received the battle game "Mortal Kombat" martial arts. This game contain blood large bursts emitted from attacks and also 'death', which stunned could run opponents after their defeat. These deaths were cruel shows animation sequences of the victorious player kill their defeated opponents in a variety of ways. The controversy surrounding the violence caused dimensions hype, which informed the less-informed gamers out there was the game and gamer reveled in this new experience. As a result, players played the game just to find out that all the talk about was this strong rising revenue.
One of the largest spark of the controversy was the latest "hot coffee" modification "Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas (GTA)". This involved unlocking a sexually oriented mini-game, which had been removed from the game before release while apparently not from source code. The creator of the game, Rockstar entertainment, obviously realized that this particular part of the game removed was gaming public and access to it not appropriate for the video. Found an enterprising fan of the game and the original code to access the content once again changed. Actions were brought against Rockstar, for the inclusion of such content in your game, although the validity of the process in question are provided. If the game is simply bought and played by the developers as intended, would never met this admittedly tasteless and inappropriate mini-game. It is not until the user made downloaded and installed that the player to the content access can change.
Regardless of the guilt is was "GTA: SA" banned in America and sale in Australia re-rated. Oddly enough the gratuitous and encouraged violence in the game went with largely unnoticed in the wake of the "scandalous" sex scenes dressed, Cartoonesque people.
If objectively tested included with almost all games a certain amount of violent content. The child-friendly, bright and colorful "Mario" games of Nintendo character have a pounding on animated creature head. In fact most games even games for children, the protagonist of crusading against a horde of enemy type and usually "disposal" of them in any way concern, whether they are striking with a weapon, or parts of the body (feet, hands, possibly a tail according to the type of the character). Difference is only real, that in a children's game "bad" characters are pretty in the General bounce backward in some and explode with a humorous sound of puff pastry (or simply disappear) while compared to older, more mature players in a game oriented rather (somewhat) realistic, the characters spraying a gusher of be red after her death.
When getting some young person somewhere a violent crime nowadays it seems a video game blamed get commits from "Duke Nukem" and "High massacre, Quake" accused for the Columbine to a more recent incident with a group of minors their violent actions of the video game "Mortal Kombat" attribute. Without solid evidence in any case, it is difficult to say whether video game violence has actually much impact on players. To be really sure a control group would have isolated probably you have children who have never seen a violent movie or played a bloody video game. However, history shows that brutal crimes, long before the video games have been committed or caused even movies.
Children are affected by something that excited, they are quite easy, and I've seen this much happen. Games often results in a wrestling video game with a group of eight-year-old, screaming to the eight-year-old raucously and trying on the ground that nail down each other. Teenagers are often punch and acts - their way from the attitudes have seen a cinema in terrible fighting after a martial arts film. The current system existing content rating is aligned; not on consumers constraint It aims largely simply informing the public about what they experience. Legal restrictions are not actually made in place, to the higher, stricter reviews in x-rated films such as. Parents and parent company must generally to start taking an interest in, indicating certain types of content. Instead of complaining about the entertainment, who enjoy a child is, the parent it could start view of the opinion that all entertainment will be printed which clearly on the packaging. A simple "I don't think this is, like about this game?" "It has a lizard!"draws an amazing number of times the child. In my experience, children really just wants that an interest in what they are interested in, take not only indistinct murmuring, "Yes this is dear, Nice." as a child installed latest violent game.
What the children who play the games in the restricted rating categories? The only way that even the game is currently in its possession if a parent (or someone of legal age) acquires the game for the child, or if the storage disregarded the rating policies in place and sold it to them, regardless. Either way that a game content in a minor liked hands is not the fault of the game developer.
I am not to defend the integrity of artistic vision presented in video games are how many other players. Artistic integrity in rendering of blood, which is more and more fluid in appearance seems frankly to me to be little. I however enjoy some games that are quite violent in nature and in many cases play the violent nature of the game increases my joy. Video games are escapism, there is (probably) no point in playing a video game that simulates something, you just walk outside and can do (and still sports games somehow consistently sell in large numbers... curious...). Interestingly, I have felt never, in a Kung Fu-attitude and commit murder decompose the overwhelming desire. Perhaps more important than simply prohibit questionable content in video games will study would, why this content is so attractive to today's society?