Trading psychology vs-trade method

Trading psychology is become so far discussed and promoted through books and consultants, that it a very convenient rationalization and apology for losing is. Why take responsibility for the lack of work ethic and trade concept of a plan an honest assessment of the a hit on the trader would be self-esteem - if you can blame only on trading psychology, instead?
Trading psychology is "something" that created a merchant from existing personality traits that are not originally understanding with trade, but surface of trading without method. The result is fear of course but would not this be the case if it on, which was perceived as a "dangerous", and that was done without the necessary knowledge and skills? To accept trade with its inherent characteristic financial risks while participating in unknown results is certainly "dangerous", and therefore required more preparation, and that means understand.
Trade scenario
Looking at it the trading plan has the following three installation types: (1) initial, that give your proposed trade entry (2) that serves first sequel to a trade, if you have either missed your first entry, or decided that you wanted further confirmation, because it a counter direction trade was (3) second continuation as trade addon preparation should, but is also a 'last' chance, to give a trade.
You get a first sale installation that causes, but not trade take = HANDELSFRAGEN1. Trade breaks cleanly and is what would have resulted in a partial profit, and then before the price drops further, points it back to the area, where the sale was carried out. This price holds so the swing remains short and what do think of this resistance, is now you get the trigger to fire of your first sequel setup but you either take this trade not = trade2. Why not trade was taken? You decide that after missing the first entry that you have missed trade Their emotions and prejudices tell you that the 'move' is gone too far. This trade breaks again clean, add not only the profits of HANDELSFRAGEN1, but also a partial profit on trade2 type.
Price now consolidated between the low and the price resistance, which you will normally use would remain short when the first trade or the first sequel to trade had taken. Instead of the swing reverse after consolidation, further down again, and with this your second continuation continuation = Setup trigger trade3. AND again - take trade. Finally, if you either do not take the first two businesses, how might these trade; take Perhaps you were gone wrong, if you thought that the movement had to take trade2 too far, but that's certainly the case for trader3.
Trade3 is a profitable business such as HANDELSFRAGEN1 and trade2. This swing really has in a large directional motion with each break holding on weak the tests - a prime example of the strengthen your trading method, but you have never entered a trade. You're going nuts! You are always in this damn swing - you can not more throw it. A further retrace holds up so a lower. You must setup an entry, but that nothing that others were three stores after a low makes highly profitable. It is not interesting, not give the same emotions that would let your trading plan, are now "forcing you to a non-plan trade.
Instead of your trade go to a lower low and it is a profit, instead to a higher low and then returns to a first purchase. Bad got only worse you also not completed, if the swing in buy goes. In trade for what you went through to finally have to try, it works, and the trend is down - right? TraderA used buy this initial to leave their profitable sales and sell addon; They decide that they want further confirmation of swing reverse prior to the trade of the performance counter direction. A first continuation Setup throws and they go long the swing was reversed, and this trade reached its first profit target.
TraderB finally 'gives up' and their short stops, although the first sequel with a two point loss, instead of the intended one point and without regard to take their next plan trade to buy. These merchants is done for the day, but at least they were "real" all together; the wings had enter too far gone and had their fears justified that was losing trade, they should not enter.
Is this a way trade or trading psychology problem? What is 'News' TraderB to see what is happening. They take the position that they should not be held responsible, they can trade not only because of trading psychology? Or will they recognize, that the way that the resulting loss was no method-trade, and even if it was who would loss was by the previous winner win. Be they acknowledge that they are true of their worst fears and not only Kronen from it a losing trade, he enlarged it this loss, and then another method avoid trading profit.
Admitted, psychology happens involved scenario in trade described with what is, but this is a function of the individual 'core' personality, and would very probably be a problem regardless of what happens; If "Risk", it is a 'emotional' response. It is first necessary, personal psychology of trading-psychology and the use of this concept as an excuse for trade to separate actions. If trading psychology are controlled, this will follow the dealer through the development and implementation of a tested plan, ready is. Not with 'integrated' apologies for incorrect Act, are lost, before you begin, and will continue to do so this will be no longer possible with an ongoing 'snowballing' emotion to the extent that in the trade.